Considerations to Overcome Energy Insecurity in Remote Communities

Energy insecurity in off-grid communities poses significant challenges in many countries, resulting in unaffordability, stunted economic growth, and adverse environmental and health impacts. In Canada, these challenges are particularly pronounced in northern and remote communities, which endure harsh winter conditions. These communities primarily rely on diesel fuel due to its portability and established infrastructure. However, diesel presents several problems, including high costs and intermittent energy supply.

One potential solution is the exploration of renewable energy as a base load power source. However, transitioning to renewables involves careful consideration of several factors:

  1. Technical Considerations: For a successful transition, renewable energy sources must be abundant and accessible in the region. For example, solar energy requires consideration of seasonal variations, biomass depends on local availability, and wind energy must be compatible with the area's wind classifications. The chosen technologies must also be resilient to extreme environmental conditions, such as subarctic cold. Logistics are another critical factor, particularly in remote communities that lack all-season roads or coastal access, as construction and maintenance must be carefully planned. Additionally, the performance of the energy systems must be reliable enough to maintain grid stability despite seasonal changes, resource variability, and extreme weather. It's worth noting that diesel may still play a role, though reduced, due to the variability of renewable resources.

  2. Independent Power Producers (IPPs) and Utility Support: Enabling a more affordable transition will likely involve provincial and territorial utilities allowing independent producers to generate and sell electricity back to the grid as Independent Power Producers (IPPs). This approach could attract private or community investment, reducing the need for government subsidies. While establishing IPPs has been challenging in some parts of Canada, there is a strong business case for them, especially in high-cost regions like Whale Cove, Nunavut, where energy prices reach $1.29/kWh. The Quilliq Energy Corporation (QEC) in Nunavut, Canada exemplifies how utilities can support renewable energy integration by working with municipal and Inuit-owned organizations to reduce diesel dependency, lower carbon emissions, and foster self-reliance.

  3. Community Integration and Collaboration: The QEC’s criteria for private investment emphasize the importance of community involvement and long-term relationships throughout the project's lifecycle. There are various potential impacts to consider, including the effects on the supply chain (as reduced diesel transportation might negatively affect some residents' livelihoods), the need for upskilling to operate and maintain new equipment, and the potential requirement for equity ownership in IPP projects. Additionally, there could be opportunities for lowering rates in areas with high energy costs.

While renewable energy presents a promising alternative to diesel in remote Canadian communities, the transition requires thorough consideration of technical, economic, and social factors to ensure its success.

Previous
Previous

Community Energy Plans: Technical analysis meets community vision

Next
Next

Quantifying the Price of Overlooking the “S” in ESG